Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided September 22, 2017No. 07-CV-95-LRRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LINDA R. READE, JUDGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.. .1005

II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND. ..1005

III. ANALYSIS... 1008

A. Waiver.. .1009

B. Is Preclusion Required?.. .1011

C. Judicially Sanctioned Material Alteration.. .1015

D. Findings on Remand.. .1017

1. Legal standard.. .1019

2. Discussion.. .1021

a. Statute of limitations.. .1021

b. Concession that the claimant suffered no severe or pervasive harassment.. .1023

c. No notice or opportunity to remedy. . .1024

d. Complaint properly remedied. . .1032

e. Not severe or pervasive.. .1040

3. Summary.. .1049

E. Reasonable Fees..…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation v. Ingram Barge CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
  3. Vanessa Colley v. John S. Colley. IIITennessee Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API