Legal Opinion
Fukaya v. Velho
District Court, D. Guam
Decided March 30, 1976No. Civ. 74-189PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
DUEÑAS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are the decedents of Hiroyuki Fukaya and have filed a wrongful death action against Ronald Richard Velho, hereinafter referred to as “Velho”, Chrysler Pacific Autos, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Chrysler”, China Insurance Company, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as “China Insurance”, and State Farm Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”.
The alleged facts are essentially as follows: Velho, a resident of California, visited Guam briefly and rented a car owned by Chrysler. China Insurance allegedly had a policy in effect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Limited v. LejeuneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. M/V John E. CoonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
- McClanahan v. Trans-America InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Batton v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Hall v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Southeastern Express Systems v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Batton v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986