Legal Opinion
People v. Robles
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Julius Vinik, J.
The central issue in this case: Is a dealer in used cars or an operator of a body repair shop engaged in a “pervasively regulated” business authorizing a warrantless (administrative) search by the police?
Defendant moves to suppress (a) his statements to Police Officer Richard Arroyo, and (b) the physical evidence seized without a warrant from his business premises on March 23,1983 and the physical evidence seized on March 25, 1983 pursuant to a search warrant issued that day.
*420The court conducted a combined Huntley-Mapp hearing at which Police Officer Richard…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SullivanNew York Supreme Court · 1985