Legal Opinion

Heydar v. Westport Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 29, 2005No. 04-55262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Ahmad Heydar appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Westport Insurance Company in Heydar’s action against Westport for refusing to defend and indemnify him on a complaint filed against him. We affirm.(1) The district court did not err when it determined that a claim had been made against Heydar during the 2000-2001 policy period for negligent performance of his professional services1 within the meaning of the policy. On its face, the broadly phrased complaint against him encompassed services he could (and did) perform in the construction of the house in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Helfand v. Nationall Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. James K. Burns Patricia Ross Walter H. Ratcliff v. International Insurance Co. Crum & ForsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Ponderosa Center Partners v. McClellan/Cruz/Gaylord & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenspon v. AIG Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API