Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 2008No. 533 CAPPublishedCited by 443 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCAFFERY, Justice.

In this capital case, Jerome Marshall (Appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County dismissing without a hearing his second petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). 1 Appellant contends that newly discovered evidence supports his claim of racial discrimination in the seating of a jury during his trial and penalty hearing, in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Following careful review, we affirm.

The relevant early history of the instant case has been…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by443 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

438 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API