Legal Opinion
Anthony Paul Maxwell v. Bernie Aispuro, Warden Attorney General of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1992No. 91-55501Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
979 F.2d 855
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Anthony Paul MAXWELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Bernie AISPURO, Warden; Attorney General of California,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-55501.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 4, 1992.*
Decided Nov. 16, 1992.
Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Anthony Maxwell, a California…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Feldman v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Joseph Scott Hunter, A/K/A Raymond C. Dirker v. Bernie Aispuro, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992