Legal Opinion
Haman v. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 12, 1968No. Civ. No. mPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
RONALD N. DAVIES, District Judge.
This action was commenced by Augustine Haman and Theodore Hinkel to recover commissions allegedly due them on renewal premiums paid on policies sold by them for Stockmen’s Agency, Inc. (Stockmen’s Agency) and reinsured and assumed by the defendant, Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Company of Hammond (Guarantee Reserve), an Indiana corporation.
In early 1960 Stockmen’s Agency had an exclusive agency contract with Stock-men’s Health Mutual Insurance Company1 (Stockmen’s Health) under which the agency was to sell policies written by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Geiss v. Northern Insurance AgencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Allied Mutual Insurance Company v. Gilbert Roberson, Gilbert Roberson D/B/A State Insurance Company v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Professional and Business Men's Life Insurance Company, a Colorado Corporation v. F. B. SalisburyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert C. Bryson v. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975