Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1919Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The action is for a mandatory injunction with incidental damages. It is not an action to recover real property with incidental equitable relief. Equitable relief cannot be given in an action at law. (Carroll v. Bullock, 207 N. Y. 567; Wheelock v. Noonan, 108 id. 179; Baron v. Korn, 127 id. 224; Cogswell v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 105 id. 319; Loomis v. Decker, 4 App. Div. 409; Hahl v. Sugo, 169 N. Y. 109.) Remsen v. N. Y., B. & M. B. R. Co. (111 App. Div. 413) and Davis v. Morris (36 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hahl v. . SugoNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Davis v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Carroll v. . BullockNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Loomis v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Remsen v. New York, Brooklyn & Manhattan Beach Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API