Legal Opinion

Frorer v. Gentzsch

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided April 27, 1939No. 8Published

1Opinion of the Court

Corson, J.,

Plaintiffs seek to restrain defendant from erecting, conducting, and maintaining a dog kennel and pet cemetery on property adjoining plaintiffs’ properties.

The defendant has filed preliminary objections to the bill, in the nature of a demurrer; the main objection being that the bill, upon its face, shows that plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief sought. Various other technical objections are raised but, in view of the fact that we must sustain the second objection, it is unnecessary to pass upon the other technical questions involved.

Admittedly, the only thing that has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. DunbarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Sutton v. Findlay Cemetery Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Monk v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
  4. Wahl v. Methodist Episcopal Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API