Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1919No. 5494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was convicted for permitting a minor to play pool or billiards in his billiard hall.

The evidence shows that the minor played a game in appellant’s pool or billiard hall; that the minor was about twenty years of age; that appellant did not have the consent of the parents of the boy that he might play in such billiard or pool hall. The evidence does not show and is silent as to the fact that appellant was present when the boy played in the pool hall or that he had any knowledge of it.

The State cites us to Rainbolt v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 427 to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Leech v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Ex Parte LoveCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Rainbolt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Millikin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Brannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API