Legal Opinion

Locust v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2004No. 643A02PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises out of a unique set of circumstances bringing into question the interplay between chapter 31A, Acts Barring Property Rights and chapter 29, the Intestate Succession Act, and their effect upon the Wrongful Death Act, N.C.G.S. § 28A-18-2. The primary issue is whether chapter 31A should be considered a part of chapter 29 thereby changing the rules of intestacy, for purposes of determining standing in a wrongful death action.

In this case, Helen Locust (“plaintiff’) instituted a wrongful death action, and she now appeals from a decision of the North Carolina…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Davenport v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. In Re the Estate of IvesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Evans v. DiazSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alston v. Britthaven, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Beck v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Estate of Joyner v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Frost v. AmSafe Commercial Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API