Petties v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This ease came before the Court on September 8, 1995, for an emergency hearing to show cause why defendants the District of Columbia, Dr. Franklin L. Smith, the Superintendent of the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”), and Dr. B. Garnett Pink-ney, Director of Special Education for DCPS, should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with this Court’s Orders of March 17, June 29, July 21 and August 15, 1995.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs in this case are minor students and their parents who represent a class certified by the Court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Blevins Popcorn Company, American Federation of Grain Millers, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- United States v. Latney's Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Zak Architectural Metal & Glass LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Nikita Shonta Petties,appellees v. District of Columbia,appellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.