Legal Opinion

Henry v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1942No. 8 Div. 178PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The question of moment on this appeal is: Who should take under Item 10(b) of the will of Mary W. Lusk, deceased?

Item 10 directed the executor to convert the entire residuary estate into money, and, after payment of debts and all lawful expenses and charges, divide the net balance “into four (4) equal shares or parts.

“(a) One such share I devise and bequeath to the children of my deceased brother Thomas J. Griffith, share and share alike, and if anyone be deceased to their descendants per stirpes.
“(b) One such share I devise and bequeath to the children of my deceased sister…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. De YampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Crawford v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Kenan v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Noble v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Blue v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Anderson v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Henderson v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Rhodes v. First Alabama Bank, MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API