Legal Opinion
Henry v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 16, 1942No. 8 Div. 178PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The question of moment on this appeal is: Who should take under Item 10(b) of the will of Mary W. Lusk, deceased?
Item 10 directed the executor to convert the entire residuary estate into money, and, after payment of debts and all lawful expenses and charges, divide the net balance “into four (4) equal shares or parts.
“(a) One such share I devise and bequeath to the children of my deceased brother Thomas J. Griffith, share and share alike, and if anyone be deceased to their descendants per stirpes.
“(b) One such share I devise and bequeath to the children of my deceased sister…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duncan v. De YampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Crawford v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Kenan v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Noble v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kimbrough v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Blue v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Anderson v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Henderson v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Rhodes v. First Alabama Bank, MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.