Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kaufer Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 21, 1922No. 6864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Eibelant seeks to recover the value of and transportation charges paid for a consignment of candles from Brooklyn, N. Y. to Seattle, Wash. It alleges delivery in good condition, the payment of the transportation charges, and the damages or the destruction of the consignment en route by reason of melting and, running together. The respondent admits the consignment, the,payment of the transportation charges, and affirmatively alleges:

“That, if in fact the said damage occurred when in the respondent’s possession, it was because they were not able to bear the ordinary heat…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. The GlenlochyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The SkipseaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. The Thomas P. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  3. Kaufer Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
  4. S. L. Jones & Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  5. The IndienDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API