Legal Opinion

Jones v. Graham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

A ppeal from the Circuit Court of Coosa. Tried before the Hon. Nat. Cook. Assumpsit by Nathaniel S. Jones against John G. Graham, who was the lessee of the penitentiary during the years 1848 and 1849, to recover the salary which plaintiff claimed to be due him as physician of tho penitentiary during those years.— It is unnecessary to notice particularly the several rulings of the court to which the assignments of error relate, as they are not material to an understanding of…

Read the full summary

A ppeal from the Circuit Court of Coosa. Tried before the Hon. Nat. Cook. Assumpsit by Nathaniel S. Jones against John G. Graham, who was the lessee of the penitentiary during the years 1848 and 1849, to recover the salary which plaintiff claimed to be due him as physician of tho penitentiary during those years.— It is unnecessary to notice particularly the several rulings of the court to which the assignments of error relate, as they are not material to an understanding of the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChilton, C. J.

By the second section of the act “ To provide for the appointment of inspectors and physicians for the penitentiary,” approved Feb. 3rd, 1848, “the physician of the penitentiary shall be appointed by the lessee, with tho advice and consent of the inspectors; and the inspectors shall have power to remove any physician, at all times, for incompetency, or neglect of his duties as such physician; and when any vacancy occurs in the office of physician, which is not filled by the lessee as herein provided, within three days after the happening of such vacancy, the inspectors shall, on the fourth…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turcott v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Masterson v. MastersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API