Curry v. Curry

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Imperato, J.H.O.), dated August 8, 1997, as (a) awarded the defendant wife maintenance, (b) failed to credit him with pendente lite maintenance he paid, and (c) failed to equitably distribute certain property, and (2) a Qualified Domestic Relations Order of the same court, also dated August 8, 1997, as, in determining the “coverture fraction”, used a numerator of 66 in computing the amount of his share of the defendant’s pension, and the…