Legal Opinion
In re Bestline Products Securities & Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided November 14, 1975No. 162PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
The Panel has previously transferred all actions in this litigation to the Southern District of Florida and, with the consent of that court, assigned them to the Honorable James Lawrence King for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.1 Defendant Bestline Products, Inc. now moves the Panel for an order transferring the above-captioned actions to the Southern District of Florida for centralized pretrial processing with the litigation currently pending there. All plaintiffs oppose transfer.
We find that these tag-along actions involve…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Bestline Products Securities and Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
4Cited by4 opinions
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,275 Peter Piambino v. William E. Bailey, Bestline Products, Inc., a California Corporation, in Re Bestline Products Securities and Antitrust Litigation. Peter Piambino v. William E. Bailey, David Sylva, Compliance Officer of the California Restitutionary Fund, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980