Legal Opinion

GRAHAM

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1965No. 1483PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim. Decision 41483 Ma= or Gpaiszet In Deportation Proceedings A-10198828 . • Decided by Board June 25, .1965 Respondent, who was absent from the United States for 2 months dnHng the reqUired period of continuous physical presence, is statutorily ineligible for suspension of deportation under _section 244(a) (1), Immigration and Na- tionality Act, as amended, since any absence from the United States, no . matter how brief, during the statutory period for which continuous phystcal Presence Is required breaks the continuity of physical presence, notwith- standing Waimea v. Immigration and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter Douglas Emmert, United States of America v. Richard Gail ArriagaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Mogis v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  3. McLeod v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. United States ex rel. Bruno v. SweetDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Y-N-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
  2. BARRAGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971
  3. JALILBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API