Legal Opinion
Ebsary Gypsum Co. v. Ruby
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
The complicated transactions stated in the complaint may be summarized with sufficient accuracy as follows: Ruby and Armstrong, the owners of patents and of patented devices, made a contract with the plaintiff, the Ebsary Gypsum Company, Incorporated, whereby Ruby was to construct for the plaintiff a machine that would manufacture blocks in accordance with the patents, and whereby plaintiff was to have an exclusive license for the manufacture of such blocks within the State of New York and other designated territory. While this license was in force, Ruby constructed another…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bosley v. National MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Chase v. WetzlarSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bryan v. . University Pub. Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- May v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Long Island Trust Co. v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Cooper v. MorinNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. RichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Robinson v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.