Legal Opinion

Woolart Mills, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 22, 1969No. C.D. 3943Published

1Opinion of the Court

'Wilson, Judge:

These three protests were consolidated for trial. The entries, which were made at the port of New York, N.Y., were received in evidence without being marked.

The merchandise is invoiced as either short silk noils, type 15; or silk noils, short noils; or short silk noils, respectively, in protest 59/20658, entry No. 832940; protest 60/7884, entry No. 378475; protest 60/9822, entry No. 358958. Entries were made respectively on 11/30/56; 6/25/56; 4/5/57.

The collector of customs assessed duty at the rate of 17% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1201, Tariff Act of 1930, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woolart Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API