Legal Opinion

United States v. Zemlyansky

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 2018No. Docket 16-409; August Term 2017PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wesley, Circuit Judge:

Twice-in 2013 and 2015-the Government tried defendant-appellant Mikhail Zemlyansky for his alleged involvement in criminal activity. The first jury did not convict him, but the second jury did. On appeal, Zemlyansky argues that the second conviction amounted to double jeopardy, because the Government secured the conviction by proving an issue the first jury had already decided in his favor. We are asked to decide whether the issue-preclusion component of the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the Government from predicating a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. N.J. Carpenters Health Fund v. NovaStar Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. ManganoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
  3. United States v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. (HC) Verdugo v. PfeifferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (PS) Iliya v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API