South of South Street Neighborhood Ass'n v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
PRESIDENT Judge PELLEGRINI.
I respectfully dissent because the Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment’s (Zoning Board) Findings of Fact do not support the grant of a variance in this case. As noted by the majority, the Zoning Board stated two reasons why it concluded that Dung Phat LLC had established unnecessary hardship: (1) the building would require extensive reconstruction to be suitable for a modern industrial use; and (2) Dung Phat LLC had unsuccessfully tried to sell the property for an industrial use over several years.
To establish unnecessary hardship, an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arter v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Philadelphia v. Earl Scheib Realty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Spc Co. v. Zoning Bd. of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Arter v. PHILADELPHIA ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Rees v. Zoning Hearing Board of Indiana TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.