Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gray v. Aiken

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1949No. 16649Published

1DissentDuckworth, Chief Justice

The decision of the majority is based upon the theory that the contract in question is too indefinite to be valid, and that the petition seeking recovery, which alleges all the facts involved, is insufficient to withstand the general demurrer. The .contract of employment consists of a letter from the employee and a letter in reply thereto from the employer. The employee’s letter proposes in the third paragraph thereof that he shall be employed for a period of one year at a salary of $7500 and in addition thereto a share of the profits to be determined by the employer at the end of the year,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Silver v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Noble v. Joseph Burnett Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Brennan v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Leffler Co. v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Wheeler v. Pan-American Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API