Hatcher v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
When this panel first saw Lee Hatcher’s case against the City of Indianapolis and various individual defendants, he was complaining about the way in which the district court had calculated the attorneys’ fees to which he was entitled as a result of his recovery of $100,000 in settlement of his claims. See Hatcher v. Consol. City of Indianapolis, 323 F.3d 513 (7th Cir.2003). In their settlement agreement, the parties had specifically designated Magistrate Judge Shields as the individual judicial officer who would be responsible for calculating the fee award. Id. at 515. We held that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Briggs v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Darryl Simpson v. Michael Sheahan, Sheriff of Cook County, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- William R. Leffler and Shirley Jolliff, Cross-Appellees v. Ralph Meer, Cross-Appellants, and Howard Shake, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dominguez v. Quigley's Irish Pub, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Belk, Sr. v. WatsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024
- Reed v. LarsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024
- THOMAS v. SHOSHONE TRUCKING, LLC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023