Legal Opinion

Elks v. . Hemby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Foushee, J., ai March Term, 1912, of Pitt. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinibn of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, 0. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. Tbe defendant, Adam Hemby, who is an ignorant colored man, applied to tbe plaintiffs, who owned a store in tbe neighborhood, to lend him $1,900 to assist in purchasing a tract of-land. Tbe plaintiffs agreed to do so, but required, as defendants allege, a bonus of $1,100 and a mortgage for tbe $3,000 payable in ten annual installments, with interest. Subsequently,' tbe vendor, on tbe suggestion of tbe plaintiffs and with tbe assent of tbe defendant, conveyed tbe land directly to tbe plaintiffs, with an tinderstanding, as tbe defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doster v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Ward v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Gray v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Erwin v. Morris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Bennett v. Best.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Charles A. Riley Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API