Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1997No. 01S01-9605-CC-00084PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

We granted this appeal to review two familiar exceptions to the rule which excludes hearsay statements from a trial: statements relating to a startling event or condition made while under the stress of excitement from the event or condition; and statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis and treatment.

The defendant was convicted of aggravated rape. • The trial court ruled that statements made by the victim to her mother were excited utterances and, therefore, admissible under Tenn. R. Evid. 803(2). The trial court also ruled that the victim’s statements…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Morgan v. ForetichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BaroneTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. StoutTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. DellingerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API