Legal Opinion
Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. Deaton
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
This is a motion pursuant to section 187 of the Civil Practice Act to change the place of trial of this action from Onondaga County to Cattaraugus County on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted thereby.
*91The contract, which is the subject matter of the action, was entered into in Cattaraugus County, New York. It involved improvements to premises located in that county. The contract recites that the contractor plaintiff had an office in the city of Olean, New York, which is in Cattaraugus County and the negotiations leading up to the execution of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Benson v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Greve v. Aetna Live-Stock Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- Behrman v. Pioneer Pearl Button Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Syracuse Plaster Co. v. Agostini Bros. Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- Hudson County Consumer's Brewing Co. v. OdellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Awning v. AbbottNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. DemkoNew York Supreme Court · 1974