Legal Opinion
John David Contracting, Inc. v. Brozek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 8, 1995No. C8-95-560PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants Peter and Dubravka Brozek contend the district court erred in finding their construction contract with respondent John David Contracting was an open end credit plan under Minn.Stat. § 334.16(l)(b) (1992) thereby entitling respondent to charge more than the maximum interest rate allowed by Minn.Stat. § 334.01.
FACTS
In May 1992, appellants entered into a contract with respondent to do construction work on their home. In September 1993, respondent filed a complaint against appellants seeking execution of its mechanics’ lien against appellants for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Goldman v. First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Miller v. Colortyme, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Wise Furniture v. DehningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- American Accounts & Advisers, Inc. v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peterson v. GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of BusinessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016