National Silver Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Dissent
*409DISSENTING OPINION
EiohaRdson, Judge:
The exclusionary rule which was applied to paragraph 212 in the case of Maher-App & Company v. United States, 44 CCPA 22, C.A.D. 630, is equally applicable to paragraph 211 in this case. This rule provides that: “No application of the similitude statute can put it into a classification from which it is expressly excluded.” Cresca Co. (Inc.) et al. v. United States, 17 CCPA 83, T.D. 43376, at page 85; see also United States v. Steinberg Bros., 47 CCPA 47, 50, C.A.D. 727.
Paragraph 211 covers “earthenware * * * composed of a nonvitri-fied absorbent body” and,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dental Perfection Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958