Christopher Richardson v. Kathy Griffin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives a criminal defendant the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him”; that right applies to both federal and state prosecutions. Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 42, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) (citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 406, 85 S.Ct. 1065, 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965)). In this case, Christopher. Richardson contends that Indiana’s courts violated his Confrontation Clause rights when they permitted the use at his trial of testimonial, out-of-court statements of witnesses who fingered him as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brendan Dassey v. Michael DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Juan Reyes v. Mindi NurseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Alvarez-Valencia, Jorge v. Tegels, LizzieDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
- Brendan Dassey v. Michael DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Brown, George v. Jess, CathyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.