Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Quigley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 29, 1941PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

In the Probate Court a divorce nisi was granted to the libellant on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment. The questions are whether the libellee was guilty of such treatment and, if she was, whether the libellant condoned her conduct.

The judge made a “Voluntary Finding of Material Facts” which from its form and substance appears to have been intended as a complete statement of the facts that influenced him to his decision. Compare Birnbaum v. Pamoukis, 301 Mass. 559, 561, 562.

*416The evidence is not reported. The findings of fact, whether particular or general, must therefore be taken as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Drew v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Maier Hanson v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Bailey v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hayden v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Turner v. MorsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Lucier v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. O'Brien v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Zildjian v. ZildjianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API