Legal Opinion

K. P. S. Restaurant Corp. v. Browne

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Plaintiff employer moves for a temporary injunction. The action seeks a permanent injunction and damages against defendant union, hereafter referred to as ‘ ‘ Local 164 ”. In a companion action, another union, hereafter referred to as “ Local 51 ”, is the plaintiff. That action is based on the same set of facts, and in it Local 51 seeks a permanent injunction and damages and has moved for a temporary injunction. Local 164 cross-moves in each proceeding on the complaint alone for dismissal of the respective complaints. The motions for temporary injunction and the cross motions to dismiss the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Harold Levinsohn Corp. & Joint Board of Cloak, Suit, Skirt & Reefer Makers' UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Palermo v. MottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R.M. Perlman Inc. v. New York Coat, Suit, Dresses, Rainwear & Allied Workers' Union Local 89-22-1District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API