K. P. S. Restaurant Corp. v. Browne
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
Plaintiff employer moves for a temporary injunction. The action seeks a permanent injunction and damages against defendant union, hereafter referred to as ‘ ‘ Local 164 ”. In a companion action, another union, hereafter referred to as “ Local 51 ”, is the plaintiff. That action is based on the same set of facts, and in it Local 51 seeks a permanent injunction and damages and has moved for a temporary injunction. Local 164 cross-moves in each proceeding on the complaint alone for dismissal of the respective complaints. The motions for temporary injunction and the cross motions to dismiss the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In Re the Arbitration Between Harold Levinsohn Corp. & Joint Board of Cloak, Suit, Skirt & Reefer Makers' UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Palermo v. MottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- R.M. Perlman Inc. v. New York Coat, Suit, Dresses, Rainwear & Allied Workers' Union Local 89-22-1District Court, S.D. New York · 1992