Legal Opinion
State v. Garrett
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 2018No. 27630PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelbaum, P.J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Thomas E. Garrett, appeals from his conviction in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas after he pled no contest to possession of cocaine. In support of his appeal, Garrett contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress the drug evidence, because the investigating officers discovered the drug evidence as a result of an illegal search and seizure. For the reasons outlined below, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.
Facts and Course of Proceedings
{¶ 2} On December…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ReillyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BurroughsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. BurseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. WyattOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.