Legal Opinion

Federal Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Goldman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1926No. Docket No. 56Published

1Opinion of the Court

In my opinion the only question presented on this record is whether the signature of Mrs. Goldman to the trust mortgage was induced by a promise to pay her one-half of the proceeds thereof. She made no claim thereto until this suit to foreclose the mortgage was begun. In the meantime, she and her husband had collected their one-half of the rentals derived from the property. The trial court heard and saw the witnesses. He concluded that no such promise had been made. I concur with Mr. Justice WIEST in so holding.

There can be no question in this State of the right of a married woman to mortgage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Vries v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Just v. State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Damon v. DeevesMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Watson v. ThurberMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Wilson v. Estate of WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API