Breidbart v. Wiesenthal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to compel partnership accountings and a distribution of partnership assets, the defendants Brooklawn Associates, Britegold Associates, Hanruth Associates, Franclen Associates, Marbob Associates, and Albob Associates appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated April 4, 2012, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for a determination that the gain on the sale of real property sold by the partnerships constitutes “profits” under Partnership Law § 73.
Ordered that the order is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosen Trust v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Trust v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ronan v. Valley Stream Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Tarantino v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Breidbart v. WiesenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schultz v. SayadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Breidbart v. WiesenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016