Legal Opinion

Papas v. Chappius

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 5, 2020No. 18-897-prUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-897-pr Papas v. Chappius UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. AyalaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Rivas v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Scrimo v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. People v. PapasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API