Legal Opinion

Condo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1964No. A-13447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUSSEY, Judge. ■

The Plaintiff in Error, D. R. Condo, was charged by information in. County Court in Haskell County, Oklahoma, with the offense of Refusing To. Allow His Cattle To Be Tested. He was tripd by a jury who returned a verdict of guilty, assessing his-punishment at a fine of $100.-00. Thereafter the Plaintiff in Error filed a.Motion For New Trial, and the same w.as overruled by the court. . From the verdict of the Jury and the Order overruling the Motion 'For New. Trial, th.e Plaintiff in Error, filed an attempted appeal on the 11th day of October, 1963.

Thereafter on the 7th day of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Helterbrand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Van MeterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API