Louis v. United States
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLACK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to render a summary judgment declaring that the Acoma Tribal Court has jurisdiction over this dispute. Having reviewed the briefs of counsel 1 and being otherwise duly advised, the Court finds Plaintiffs motion is not well taken and it should be Denied.
Discussion
The Acoma-Canoncito-Laguna Indian Hospital (“ACLIH”) is operated by the United States and is located on the Acoma Pueblo. During the course of her pregnancy, Plaintiff, Michelle Louis,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cheromiah v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
- Louis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
- United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002