Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Raatz
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 2, 1991No. A91A0412PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Chief Judge.
Robert and Brenda Johnson brought suit against Aaron and Patricia Raatz on a promissory note executed pursuant to an agreement for the sale of a business, and the defendants asserted a counterclaim for the balance owed to the lien creditor of a van conveyed to the defendants as part of the sale. On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion and granted the defendants’ motion. The plaintiffs appeal.
The material facts are not in dispute. The parties entered into a “Contract for Sale and Purchase” (the “agreement”) dated April 14, 1989,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Crooks v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Byrom v. RingeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, Counter-Defendant v. Kai Lieberam, Counter-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Elliott v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Paces Partnership v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Wallis v. B & a Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Otis Elevator Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993