Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Green

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1904No. Sac. No. 1163PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. H. M. Albery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an election contest over the office of constable of Colusa Judicial Township of the county of Co lusa. The plaintiff and defendant were opposing candidates for the office. Upon the returns the defendant, Green, had two hundred and thirty-seven votes, and plaintiff, Hannah, two hundred and nineteen votes, a majority of eighteen for the former; and the board of supervisors declared Green elected. The plaintiff, Hannah, contested the election, and after a trial and recount the superior court found and held that Green had received only one hundred and eighty-five legal votes andl Hannah…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Misch v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Dean v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wilson v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garrison v. RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Anderson v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Huston v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API