Legal Opinion

Gary Helman v. Steve Smeltzley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 2014No. 12-3428PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

Gary W. Helman brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants, law enforcement officers, violated his constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments by their conduct in executing an arrest warrant for him on April 9, 2009. In the course of events, Helman was shot multiple times, and he asserts that the defendants used excessive force. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and Helman appeals.

Summary judgment is appropriate only if there is no genuine issue of material fact that could result in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Evans v. PoskonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Casna v. City of Loves ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Shaun J. Matz v. Rodney KlotkaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. William Viramontes v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Green v. ChvalaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Saunders v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Ocasio v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API