People v. District Court of Lake County
Supreme Court of Colorado
for Writ of Prohibition.)
1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.
No argument is necessary to show that, if petitioners are entitled to any relief in this cause, prohibition is the proper proceeding therefor. The Court below has taken jurisdiction of the contempt case; it has tried petitioners and adjudged them guilty of contempt; it has deferred sentence, but threatens to pronounce the same. There is no final judgment subject to review in this Court by appeal, by writ of error or by certiorari. No imprisonment has followed a sentence pronounced, and relief by habeas corpus cannot be invoked. Yet imprisonment may be a part of the sentence, and before aid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Batchelder v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Coughlin v. EhlertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Leonard v. BartelsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.