Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Babbitt Bros. Trading v. New Home Sewing Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1932No. 6781Published

1ConcurrenceWidbur, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment of affirmance for the following reasons:

The appellant seeks to have ns review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of the trial court. The ease was tried by the court, a jury having been waived. The hill of exceptions states that the trial occurred on the 2d of July, 1931; that on the 25th of August, 1931, the court filed its memorandum of authorities and derision in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant, to which ruling an exception was entered on behalf of the defendant. The bill of exceptions states that: “Thereafter, on the 26th day of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API