Legal Opinion

Schultz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 2013No. 2D12-853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Michael Schultz was convicted of armed burglary and grand theft, and he appeals, raising three issues. Of the three issues we find merit in only the third, that the State failed to provide sufficient proof of the value of the items taken during the burglary to support the charge of third-degree grand theft (greater than $300 but less than $5000).1 See Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104, 108 (Fla.1974), receded from, on other grounds, Butterworth v. Fluellen, 389 So.2d 968 (Fla.1980). We affirm Mr. Schultz’s conviction for armed burglary, the subject of his first two issues.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. FluellenSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Marrero v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Colletti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Schultz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Collier County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API