Legal Opinion

State v. Rosenman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 8, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Implicated in this appeal is whether a fine imposed upon Jack Rosenman, an inmate in a State correctional facility, to be paid as a condition of parole, should be collected by the Bureau of Parole (Department of Corrections) and paid over to the State Treasury. In directing the inmate to make such payment the Department relied upon N.J.S.A. 2C:46-4 (Fines Act) and N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.59(g), (h) (Parole Act of 1979). Appellant,1 Monmouth County, challenges the action of the Parole Board in ordering the fine paid to the Bureau of Parole, contending that since the fine was imposed at the county…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Safeway Trails, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amato v. WilentzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. United States Court of Appeals, Third CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API