Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Richfield Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1930No. 6108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals. The facts as found by the Board are substantially as follows: The Richfield Oil Company and the Olinda Gasoline Company are California corporations, with their principal offices at Los Angeles. The Olinda Company was a producing company, organized in 1913. The Richfield Company was a distributing company, organized shortly before the Olinda Company. The Olinda Company was promoted and organized by J. P. Vordermark, who was a practical and experienced gasoline man. The stock of the Olinda…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Adolph Hirsch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Ice Service Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Great Lakes Hotel Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. RIVERDALE CO-OP. CREAMERY ASS'N v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  2. Burnet v. Bank of ItalyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. Handy v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Good Mfg. Co. v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API