Montgomery Traction Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Heard before Hon. W. IT. Thomas. The Montgomery Traction Company was convicted of doing business without the license required by subdivision 55, section 4122, Code 1.896, as amended by Acts 1900-01, p. 2616, and appeals. This cause was tried on the following agreed facts: That the defendant is a corporation under the laws of the state of Alabama.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Heard before Hon. W. IT. Thomas. The Montgomery Traction Company was convicted of doing business without the license required by subdivision 55, section 4122, Code 1.896, as amended by Acts 1900-01, p. 2616, and appeals. This cause was tried on the following agreed facts: That the defendant is a corporation under the laws of the state of Alabama. That the amount of the paid-up capital stock of the defendant corporation is $335,000. That the Montgomery Traction Company was during the year 1906 a street railroad company, and during the said year in the city of…
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
The appellant was convicted of the offense of doing “business as a corporation in this state without a license and contrary to the provisions of subdivision 55 of section 4122 of the Code of 1896, * * * as amended by the act * * * of 1901” (Acts 1900-01, p. 2616). The agreed statement of facts shows that the defendant corporation is a street railroad company, operating a street railroad in the city of Montgomery; that it has paid for and taken out a license as a street railroad company ,as required by subdivision 34 of section 4122 of the Code of Alabama, as amended by Act March 4, 1903 (Acts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bland v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Troy Fertilizer Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Spira v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chinnabee Cotton Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910