Legal Opinion

Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to "dismiss an appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 15, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Read the full summary

Motion to "dismiss an appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 15, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the grounds that the order allowing the appeal does not recite that a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals; that no such question is involved; that said order was granted improvidently and without notice to the respondent, and that so much of…

1Opinion of the Court

The motion is to vacate allowance of an appeal made ex parte, by a judge of this court, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, from a judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division which had refused to certify that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The allowance of the appeal is not reviewable; the application for the allowance could be made ex parte.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlisle v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API