Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Collins

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1959No. 31278Published

1DissentWoodley, Judge

One charged with a capital felony is not entitled to bail merely because of the presence of some testimony raising a defensive issue. Ex parte Ross, 94 Texas Cr. Rep. 313, 251 S.W. 233, citing Ex parte Smith, 23 Texas App. 100, 5 S.W. 99, and Ex parte Jones, 31 Texas Cr. Rep. 422, 20 S.W. 983.

The only testimony found in this record, which, if admitted at the trial, could require a charge on self-defense was that of appellant’s brother as to appellant’s statement after he went to his mother’s home following the killing. The statement appellant contends was res gestae and admissible as such.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Ex parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  3. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API