Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Dissent
*455DYKMAN, J.
¶ 49. (dissenting). Once in awhile the conduct or character of a litigant so overshadows the merits of a case that the former becomes the reason the litigant cannot be successful at trial. Unfortunately, this is such a case.
¶ 50. The majority's analysis of this case, at its core, is this: Mucek satisfied the prejudice requirement of Wis. Stat. § 804.11(2)1 (1999-2000) by telling the trial court of NCI's egregious behavior during discovery. And even if Mucek did not prove prejudice, the trial court had discretion to deny NCI's motion to withdraw its admissions in order to control its…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Carney v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. KasuboskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.